(by brennc26@tcd.ie)

The Girl With the Pimply Face:

The Girl with the Pimply Face is a short story unlike any other extracts we have read this semester. In my opinion, the main themes presented to us in this story are the themes of compassion and discrimination.

From the very outset we are presented with the theme of discrimination through the druggist’s discriminatory remark ”But they’re foreigners and you know how they are.”  This remark serves to marginalise the sick baby from the very outset. The narrator of this story serves to refute this discrimination however as he personifies the theme of compassion. Although he was “just sitting down to lunch”, he still succeeds in reaching the patient’s house by two-thirty and expresses no anger on discovery that no one is home. What I found interesting about this narrator was his non-judgemental character. Unlike the druggist who seemed rather dismissive, the narrator reserves all judgement regarding the foreign immigrants. He does not look upon the fifteen year old girl with disgust or scepticism but instead retains a high degree of respect for her. “Boy, she was tough and no kidding. I fell for her immediately”.  His sense of compassion is inherent in his ability to recognise her “excellence”- a complete contrast to his wife who later regards her as a “Pimply faced little bitch”. Throughout the story, “The Girl with a Pimply Face” is extremely unhelpful as she seems “indifferent as though it had been no relative of hers instead of her sister” and yet the doctor expresses no frustration and his adulation shines through as he describes her as “A tough little nut finding her own way in the world.” He seems to perfectly encapsulate “the Art of Medicine” as not only does he wish to help the baby, but also expresses concern regarding the young girl’s leg.

Although the doctor seems compassionate and intent on helping his patients, he still harbours pre-conceived notions regarding the immigrant family. This is thrown into relief as he assumes that this baby has been somewhat neglected”No doubt it had been in a bad way before that, improper feeding etc,etc.”.  He is also somewhat short regarding the mother and makes little attempt to comfort her or to even fully explain the situation.

The theme of discrimination is encapsulated in the wife’s reaction upon hearing the narrator’s story. She seems strongly opposed to such “charity work” and is immediately sceptical “Did they pay you.” She seems intent on demonizing the immigrant family as she retells Kate’s story. I feel that this character serves to reflect the discrimination inherent in society. This sense of prejudice is later emphasized as a fellow doctor expresses outright disdain for these Russian immigrants. I feel the author sets up a parallel between the narrator and his more sceptical colleague in an attempt to highlight the narrator’s compassion. The narrator’s compassion is in complete contrast with his colleague’s caustic criticism as he describes the immigrant mother as a “bugger” and the daughter as a “pimply-faced bitch”. The narrator even defends the mother’s actions by describing them as “Natural maternal instinct” to which his colleague replies “Whisky appetite, if you should ask me.”

The story ends with a final visit to the immigrant family. The narrator’s sense compassion is clearly unblemished by his wife’s and colleague’s advice. This is apparent in his unbridled admiration for the fifteen year-old “ A powerful little beast”.  It is obvious that the narrator does not seek monatory reward but is instead content with the sense of satisfaction which comes from helping others”God it is I said. And it was much better.” The story then ends with a sense of hope for the young girl as she returns to school. I feel that this ending seeks to highlight the importance of compassion, especially in healthcare.

The Use of Force

“The use of Force” is somewhat different to “ The Girl with The Pimply Face.” “The Use of Force” by William Carlos Williams addresses the exertion of physical superiority over others, asking the fundamental question: is it ethical to hurt someone for his own good? While “The Girl with the Pimply Face” displays a straightforward kind of compassion, “The Use of Force” shows us that compassion is not always straightforward. From the outset, the doctor displays patience as he tries to coax the young girl to open her mouth. When he realizes the futility of his approach, he gives the child an ultimatum “Will you open it now by yourself or shall we have to open it for you?” Williams’ choice to use interior monologue as a “stream-of-consciousness” tool reflects the narrator’s experience of dialogue and gives insight into the character and his appraisal of the situations he encounters. It is through this “stream-of-consciousness” that we come to realize the assertive nature of this doctor’s actions. This is seen as he steels himself for a battle “I had to do it. I had to have a throat culture for her own protection.” It is obvious then, that this doctor is committed to helping this child and his determination of purpose is untainted by a fear of hurting her. This is in contrast to the child’s father whose fear of hurting her impedes his ability to truly help her. The child’s mother is equally inept at helping her child as she cannot restrain her for fear of hurting her daughter. I feel this is highlighting the doctor’s strength of character, unlike the child’s parents. Williams creates the typical setting of tentative and indulgent parents contrasted by the assertive actions of the doctor and so we realize that doing what is best for someone is not synonymous to what is kindest. As the situation demands the story is told with wit and wry humour: ‘the damned little brat must be protected against her own idiocy, one says to ones self at such times’. The awkwardness of the situation is diffused using this humour: I could have torn the child apart…it was a pleasure to attack her…’. Here Williams presents the theme of the varied life of the doctor; in this case attempting to get a throat swab and having to battle wryly against the odds. It is a wonderful snapshot of a minor incident in the life of a doctor and outlines in a very humorous way the all too human thoughts of the doctor. The story also presents enjoyable cameos of human nature: the uselessness of the indulgent parents, the frustrations of the doctor  who is all too aware of human nature and above all the utter determination of the young girl who stubbornly refuses to co-operate. Embedded in the story is the theme of the life of the doctor entails-for all his glory and knowledge, he is still a mere human and is not immune to human fallibility.

Despite his all too human faults, I feel the story serves to highlight the heroism of this doctor as he understands that what is best is not always what is nicest.

 

JEAN BEICKE

This story is set in the USA during the Depression years in a children’s hospital where children who are the victims of poverty or unfortunate circumstances are nursed. The themes addressed are the issues of poverty, hopelessness and social decay, alongside the plight of a doctor who becomes outwardly cynical and disrespectful while at the same time managing to maintain a sense of duty and determination. The narrator doctor presents themes of poverty and social breakdown alongside the theme of his own personal battle against cynicism and fatalism balanced against his innate professional sense of duty and determination.

The narrator of the story is a battle-worn doctor who sounds overcome by a hopelessness that borders on outright cynicism.( I was taken aback) There are times in the story when the language used by this doctor makes the reader want to cry out at the wanton callousness of his observations. He refers to his child patients as ‘brats’ and observes that one child might grow up to become ‘a cheap prostitute…your country needs you, brat’. The story is masterful however in that beneath this exterior disregard for the dignity of the children under his care this doctor reveals an inner conscience and a determination that shines some light of hope on his desperate and fatalistic pronouncements. This doctor character is used to convey the desperation of the times and the strains that such social breakdown places on the doctor as a professional.

He paints a picture of a society in freefall. Many of the unwanted children in his care come from poverty in minority families – Hungarian gypsies and the Irish are cited. Yet for all the desperation and disregard portrayed through the eyes of the narrator we also glimpse themes of real hope and humanity. The care of the nurses’ shines strong – they care for the children as if they are their own children. One nurse cannot witness the post mortem of a child she has cared for. And despite himself the narrator doctor takes pleasure in the progress baby Jean Beicke makes as she gains weight and sleeps and feeds. He describes her blue eyes and shows real determination in caring for the child. He pesters the ‘ear man’ to inspect the child’s ears and he agonises over the failure to make a clear diagnosis. When all is lost and it becomes clear the child will die he cares enough to organise a post mortem to establish the cause of death and to learn for the future. He is scrupulous enough to call the ‘ear man’ in for the autopsy so that he too can benefit by discovering the real reason of death. In the words of the ‘ear man’ it was ‘a clear miss’. Perhaps the determination of the outwardly cynical narrator may save another child from a similar end.

There is also another theme that saves the narrator doctor from his own outward cynicism – that is his determination to reveal and highlight the social conditions in which people are living. When it becomes clear that baby Jean will die he makes sure to get permission from the child’s aunt to have an autopsy carried out and this is done in a discreet and sensitive way. Furthermore, the narrator of the story is careful to use the character of the aunt to tell the story of the desperation of baby Jean’s mother who is abandoned by her husband. In taking care to tell the full story of people caught in desperate circumstances he informs the reader of the real story of the Depression era and does not simply present a sentimental or judgemental presentation of the themes and issues. Behind the dreadful battle-worn pronouncements of this doctor lies a social conscience – could it be that the fatalistic and disrespectful language this doctor uses is a product of a social conscience that has left him burned-out and mentally bloodied? Bloodied but unbeaten in that he maintains a professional concern and determination to achieve some good and he possesses the humanity to appreciate the loving care of the nurses who he works with and to take real pleasure in a patient’s progress.

This is a masterful and fascinating story in that the language this doctor uses is shocking, downright disrespectful and unacceptable – yet it is this very shock value that conveys the desperation of the social conditions people live in and in this way our narrator doctor goads us into having a social conscience too. ‘Vote the straight Communist ticket’ he announces wryly and sarcastically at the end as if to say when all else fails we can always turn to the Communism! William Carlos Williams is determined in this story to present his themes of social and personal desperation and breakdown in a way that will shock and stir us into empathy, and hopefully action.